librelist archives

« back to archive

Resque 2.0

Resque 2.0

From:
Tom Blomfield
Date:
2013-09-10 @ 14:49
Hi all,

I'm starting to poke around with the Resque internals because I'd like to
contribute.

I just wondered what the roadmap & progress towards Resque 2.0 was? In
particular, I'm interested in finding out if anyone has made any progress
towards defining an API for Resque::Failures?

I've seen the comments at
https://github.com/resque/resque/wiki/Failures-2.0, and the current
code seems a little strange.

If you're working on Failures can you give me a shout, please?

Cheers

Tom

Re: [resque] Resque 2.0

From:
Cade Truitt
Date:
2013-09-10 @ 16:05
Hey Tom,

I've been diving into the failures 2.0 stuff, and I'm about to wrap up a PR
for converting Resque::Failures into actual objects per the "Failures
aren't objects" point from the wiki. I'd welcome a second set of eyes on my
PRs as well as help working through the list of remaining points.

Cade



On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Tom Blomfield <tomblomfield@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm starting to poke around with the Resque internals because I'd like to
> contribute.
>
> I just wondered what the roadmap & progress towards Resque 2.0 was? In
> particular, I'm interested in finding out if anyone has made any progress
> towards defining an API for Resque::Failures?
>
> I've seen the comments at
> https://github.com/resque/resque/wiki/Failures-2.0 , and the current code
> seems a little strange.
>
> If you're working on Failures can you give me a shout, please?
>
> Cheers
>
> Tom
>